Aug 05

A few days ago I was surprised that Giving Face had a different meaning to what I knew it to be. A little background here folks :) . I was twittering with @demiwood and I joked that she was not Giving Face to me for not adding me to her Facebook friends. Being the lovely lady that she is she found an innuendo in my post (on of the reasons I enjoy twittering with the Lady Wood).
Traditionally to ‘Giving Face’ when used in Asian context it means ‘To Honour’ or ‘Give Respect’. What I was surprised to find out ‘Giving Face’ mean to perform oral sex.
OMG!! I did NOT mean that! Luckily I hope she did not think I meant that.
So learn from this folks, ‘Giving Face’ is not just an honour thing!

written by kerry \\ tags: , , ,

Jul 06

Whoops dirty minds needed to find the funny in this.
Saw 2 Ang Mo ladies giggling and attempting to take a picture with their mobile phones.
Only after they had left did I return to look see.
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

written by kerry \\ tags: ,

May 07

With all that has happened in the “AWARE Saga” as it has been called one has to take into account thing that have been said and those which have not been said. The points I’ll be covering are not all about the AWARE issues but are closely linked. Please take it with an open mind and consider how it will affect your future and your children’s future.

The way the “New Exco” took power was legal by definition. But as pointed out by my good friend Callan, it was the methods used.
Many know that AWARE had a small membership. This suddenly bloomed approximately 2-3 months before the AGM. With no new membership drives or public promotion this surge in new members can only have come from one source. Why has this not been brought up? Agreed that of the old members some may have voted for the “New Exco” but the majority which did were these new members.

Ok the “Old Guard” won the day with 1414 votes, what about the now 700 plus that voted against them? Surely you can see that this number is BIGGER than that which originally voted in the “New Exco”. So who is playing the numbers game?

The “Old Guard” is Pro-Lesbianism, Pro-Homosexuality. Lets be objective folks. How on earth can you be all inclusive if you EXCLUDE?
Logically if you start by stating “Lesbianism & Homosexuality is BAD!” what person in their right mind (Gay or Straight) will come to you expecting a Non-Biased reply and a willingness to help?

Calling it “neutral” is an expectable way of opening any dialogue. This does NOT mean you are Pro-Anything. It does show that you (and your organization) are Open Minded.

Religion condemns this way of life, you should burn in Hell!
Seriously, that is not the fastest way to win friends and influence people.
Certain religious group(s) have the view that you must make informed choices.
Show me at which point did they (gays & lesbians) not make an informed decision.
All this anti-homophobic sentiment being thrust at them is surely one big bit of information for them to decide the pros and cons.

Majority rule is NOT the right way. Religious views are not the yard stick by which choices are to be made.
So if someone disagrees with your point of view, they are not wrong. It shows that there always is another point of view.
Expecting someone to follow your view blindly is (my favorite word) MORONIC!
Lets bible quote folks (well kinds more like paraphrase) Do unto others as you would have done unto you.
Simply put I must say, and to those who need it broken down: Only kick someone in the nuts if you want the same to be done to you. Or be nice to others and they will be nice to you.

Maybe they can stop being gay/lesbian, huh? How about I ask you to stop being a colon cavity and throwing rubbish on the floor, or keep the lifts clean of your empty food packets, or throwing the junk mail you got on the floor?

Maybe I’m not being clear enough, being gay is NOT an alternative lifestyle. That is PC (politically correct) speak. When did you discover you were attracted to the opposite sex? Was it an informed decision? Suppose the majority view was Gay Is Right. Nah will never happen you cry. WRONG!! It happened, look up ancient Greek lifestyles. Sure it is the past, but it did happen and who’s to say it may not happen again.

Gay people are not in it for fun or fashion or for the sake of “sticking it to the man” (look up the meaning yourself). They honestly feel that way and I’m sure those who are religious have a hard time reconciling their faith with their belief.

Do they want to be labeled sinners? Look up the Scarlet Letter, good book which covers the moral views of the time it was written about. My point? Look around you folks how many divorced couples do you know. How many husbands and wives have had affairs. It is practically the norm these days. Why don’t you ask them to go about with a Scarlet Letter? You haven’t? They have a word for that, Hypocrite.

Sexual education in schools. Ooooh hot button topic! Why because of the Ostrich Syndrome. Stick your head in the sand and it goes away. Seriously folks I know you rather have the schools teach your kids everything, easier on your conscience right?
If something goes wrong BLAME the teachers and the school! Uh which part of Parenting did you not understand? Bringing up your own children with the standards and beliefs you have?

Lets take a quick look around, how many of you have been the victim of rude children? How many have been greeting by your little nephews and nieces with anyone telling them to? How many have had their child come home from school and say I’m going to marry my girlfriend/boyfriend?
Ok the last one was an obvious jab at Thio Su Mien. But this is all that you parents expect the school to be teaching them, while you hardly do the same. The old saying “Do as I say but not as I do” applies here. You show by deed and word what you want your little children to do.
Most of the time; they are screaming in public, running around and generally making a nuisance of themselves. Exactly when were you expecting the school to appear and tell them not to be a brat.

Now back to the hot button.
Sex education in school does NOT mean showing porno movies and giving tips.
It is a means to open up avenues of discussion with the children on topics you (the parent) won’t go near with a bio hazard suit and ten foot pole.
Exactly how were they supposed to know what to do if you won’t tell them? I know just turn on the TV and watch the latest shows. Yup that will work.

Why, only during and after this incident did concerned parent start coming out of the woodwork?
Because of, see my earlier point Ostrich Syndrome, because they expect the school to do the teaching. BUT! You cannot say SEX, Lesbian, Gay, where you can put what, what is safe, what is not safe, how, when, why.
Ok then, let some religious person teach. Lets see how that goes. A sample of basic questions that may be asked
1. Why are you called Father So-n-So if you have not kids and are not married?
2. My Lesbian friend calls other Lesbians Sister, Sister So-n-So does that mean you are a Lesbian?
3. Father So-n-So why do you wear a dress are you gay?
4. If sex is bad, am I bad because my mommy and daddy had sex?
I could go on but you get the idea.
This needs and open mind folks, things need to be said, values have to be set.
And it can be done without a religious slant, or making those who are gay/lesbian feel like genetic freaks.

How about practicing abstinence?
You can’t practice with without thinking about what you cannot do.
And what is it they cannot do? Heck if I know, because it cannot be talked about without mentioning all the taboo things that parents will not talk to their kids about.
A vicious circle it is.

MOE’s framework for sexuality education reflects mainstream views and values of Singapore society, where the social norm consists of the married heterosexual family unit.
The problem that arises is when you have gay couples married and/or with children. Why? Because then you have to explain why. Ohhh making your skin crawl eh?
It is not possible to explain it and stay unbiased, and as kids usually want a simple answer. Moral ambiguity, gray areas, its adult stuff, they will not understand.
So leave it to the schools to do the teaching.
But the schools are already teaching it, but they cannot say this, cannot say that.
A vicious circle it is.

So what have we learned?
Parents do you job! Teach your children the values they need. Explain why, don’t hide behind religion. Don’t segregate and humiliate, show them the way to understand what is going on in them biologically. Open their minds not close avenues of learning. Take responsibility for your own actions. Throw out the “it’s not my problem” attitude, because one day it just may be you and no one will help because it’s not my problem.

To AWARE let not the good that has come from this go to waste.
Don’t let it become again “that organization my mommy joined long ago”.
Make it the organization that mothers will encourage their daughters to join.
Make it the organization that men understand.

To us the people, what happened is a sign. We got too comfortable, even complacent.
There are people out there with “the right idea” just wrong ways of doing it.
It is easy to see how a coup can be done, and if no one got off their collective butts it would have succeeded.

Credits
@ctham and @hanifn and my family and friends

written by kerry \\ tags: , , , , , ,

May 01

I put a lot of thought into trying to see both points of view and sadly the “feminist mentor” is merely choosing words to spread fear, uncertainty and doubt aka FUD!
Really? After listening to a sex ed talk your daughter/son will come home and say I want to marry my girlfriend/boyfriend?
Instantly they are gay/lesbian?

Let’s look at it from another point of view.
You attend a talk that promotes the Apple iPhone, and by the end you want, NEED the iPhone. Understandable.
Replace iPhone with gay or lesbian, now seriously will that turn the average child into one?

Another example.
You attend a talk that promotes the Islam/Buddhism/Christianity, and by the end you want, NEED to convert. Understandable.
Replace Islam/Buddhism/Christian with gay or lesbian, now seriously will that turn the average child into one?

Another example.
You attend a talk that promotes the Hello Kitty dolls, and by the end you want, NEED to buy one. Understandable.
Replace Hello Kitty dolls with gay or lesbian, now seriously will that turn the average child into one?

Seriously! WAKE UP! If the “feminist mentor” thinks she has pulled one over the masses, let’s see.
No school (which offers the talks) has complained that they are now overrun with gay/lesbian students.
No parents have complained that their children are suddenly become gay/lesbian.
Even the gays and lesbians who have spoken out are puzzled by this fiasco.

Lesbianism or homosexuality is not a simple “just add water and mix” situation.

Do the right thing, start your own organization to promote what ever views and beliefs, don’t take over AWARE by underhanded means.

written by kerry \\ tags: , , , ,

Apr 08

I thought I wait a few days to see what the fall out to the latest Microsoft commercials would be.
Guess what, the obvious happened.
Adrian Kingsley-Hughes posted on March 31st, 2009
Two mistakes Microsoft made in its “I’m just not cool enough to be a Mac person” ad I the ZDnet Blogs.

What seems to be missed is the fact that Microsoft does NOT make PCs, it made the OS that runs on any PC you want to build. (Lets not get silly and point out you cannot run XP on a built with parts from 1995)
Apple on the other hand DOES make PCs, (yes folks ALL Macs are PCs because they are personal computers. PC does not equate to Microsoft. Why? Because Linux also runs on PCs which are…wait for it…Personal Computers!) Apple also makes the OS that runs on the PCs they build.
So what is my point? There no mistake has been made.
According to Adrian
Mistake #1 – Setting the price point at $1,000

A $1,000 is a lot of dough to people in the current climate, and the ad hits us with this upper limit price 7 seconds in. I’m guessing that a lot of people switched off by that point before getting to the meat of the ad. On top of that, the $1,000 upper limit was also a bad idea given that the final system cost under $700 (I’d have set the limit at $750 given that outcome) and that it allowed Apple to sneak in a system priced at that upper limit (thus telling people that Apple have a notebook for $1,000).

Can you really buy a brand new Mac laptop for a $1,000 or less? But you can get a laptop running Microsoft Windows. So why a $1,000 price point? Simple, in this current climate you really have to be flush with cash to spend more. Thus anything less that can get you what “Lauren” wanted is a deal. The $750 final price just proved the point.
Please note, you can get even cheaper and more powerful systems if she wanted a desktop! But Lauren wanted a laptop.

Mistake #2 – Not hammering home the cost of a comparable Apple system

I think that the ad stumbles big style when it comes to handling the price difference between a 17-inch Mac system and the system that the red-headed Lauren ultimately buys from Best Buy.

In the ad Lauren says that in order to buy a Mac she’d have to double her budget of $1,000 if she was to be “cool enough to be a Mac person”. In reality a 17-inch MacBook Pro costs $2,799, so she’d need to triple her budget. Out it another way, she could have bought four of the notebooks she picked for that price. Most people would consider $2,800 to be a lot of cash and the contrast between the HP system and the MacBook Pro system.

Hammering home the cost? Why bother. The fact is, the price was set at a $1,000.
Anything more would seem like they were trying too hard to convince the wrong target audience.

Funny thing thought in an earlier post Adrian has the right idea in a way. It is what you can get for the price you want. What you can do with the OS you get.

“I’m just not cool enough to be a Mac person”
This is just the minor poke at the Apple Ads. Yes it is minor, because it is not the main thrust of the commercial.

Let me say for the record, the commercial did what it was supposed to do. Is it a success? Is it a failure? That my friends is up to you, and what you decide to buy. Me? I’ll buy a Mac when I find that the Mac can do something I need that my “PC” cannot do.

written by kerry \\ tags: , , , , , , ,

Apr 01

Wow, talk about getting into the niche market!
The iPod Vibrator by OhMiBod
Image and video hosting by TinyPic
Photoshoped? But this is real!
OhMiBod

written by kerry \\ tags: , ,

Mar 24

Seen on the National Geographic site
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/04/photogalleries/giant-crystals-cave/index.html
Crystal Cave 1
Crystal Cave 2

written by kerry \\ tags: ,

Mar 18

Image and video hosting by TinyPic
(Here’s the reply the teacher received the following day)

Dear Mrs. Jones,

I wish to clarify that I am not now, nor have I ever been, an exotic dancer.

I work at Home Depot and I told my daughter how hectic it was last week before the blizzard hit.

I told her we sold out every single shovel we had, and then I found one more in the back room,

and that several people were fighting over who would get it.

Her picture doesn’t show me dancing around a pole.

It’s supposed to depict me selling the last snow shovel we had at Home Depot.

From now on I will remember to check her homework more thoroughly before she turns it in.

Sincerely,
Mrs. Smith

written by kerry \\ tags: ,

Mar 18

Saw this, and well the picture says it all.
Feel free to pass it around.
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

written by kerry \\ tags: ,

Mar 16

In the black humour dept.
In a tragic incident, google ADs made a fubar.
Click image to view larger version.
Bad Google Ad placement

written by kerry \\ tags: , , , ,